I don't approach Salesforce problems through predefined roles — developer, admin, architect, analyst. I approach them as systems: how things connect, where complexity accumulates, what becomes fragile six months later.
When I’m asked to build something, my first instinct is to step back and understand the structure underneath it — what’s actually changing, what should stay flexible, where duplication is quietly metastasizing. That usually leads to fewer moving parts, not more. Most Salesforce implementations don’t fail because of bad code. They fail because nobody was looking at the whole thing at once.